The following article is based on excerpts from an
interview with Mr. Jack Burdick, co-inventor at U.C.C., Linde division.
MJ:
Mr. Burdick, would you tell us how you
happened to develop the star?
Burdick: I must go back to about 1920. In Europe as in all other
places since, synthetic blue sapphire has never been a satisfactory
material. Regardless of how you grow it, the color seems to
segregate on the outside of the boule. So in Europe at one time
they were attempting to get better distribution of the color in blue
sapphire. They kept adding magnesium oxide to the sapphire until
finally they made spinel. When they made blue spinel, they
thought it was blue sapphire. In fact, it was sold for blue
sapphire for a considerable period of time before it was detected that
it wasn't blue sapphire at all. It was spinel.
In about 1947 we were attempting to do the same
thing the Europeans were trying to do back in 1925 . . .
that was, to try to improve the blue sapphire by getting a more
uniformly colored material. You'll remember we said the color of
blue sapphire was due to iron and titania. We thought that
perhaps we could eliminate the iron and get the blue color with titania
if we properly heat treated the material after we grew it.
So, we left the iron out of the formula and we put
only titania in it. Then our plan was to heat this in a furnace
with a reducing atmosphere. We felt that if we reduced the TiO2
we would be able to get a blue color without the presence of
iron. So we manufactured these sapphires with only titania in
them. We heated them for several days in a furnace at a high
temperature. And when we took them out, they were star sapphires.
However, we didn't recognize them immediately as
being such. But we did see that they were different. They
were slightly milky. They had some indication that there were
different rays within the sapphire. We didn't know if we had
cat's-eyes, if we had stars, or exactly what we had. However, my
brother was an amateur lapidary and had a little shop in his house only
a few blocks away. So I took some of these boules that had been
heat treated and grown only with titania as the colorant to his house
and told him to cut cabochons from them. I suggested that if he
notice anything particularly, that he should telephone me.
So, this Sunday in late December, 1947, he called me
and said he thought these stones looked different. I went over to
his house and looked at them under his fluorescent light. They
did look a little different, but not particularly so. In the
course of the conversation, we decided to go out on the back porch for
a cigarette. It was a nice, sunshiny day, even though it
was winter. We carried one of these stones on a dop stick with
us. As we stepped on the porch and the sun hit the dop stick
. . . there was the star!
So you might say . . . like the
Europeans in making spinel . . . they were trying to
do something different. We also, at the time we made stars were
trying to do something different. MJ: Did you
have it in mind to create gemstones?
Burdick: At that time Linde's business was both industrial
and jewelry. However, there were no stars. Some blue as
well as some ruby stones as well as other colors were being sold to
lapidaries who made regular faceted gem stones from them.
MJ:
Then would you say that the discovery of the star was an accident?
Burdick: You might say that it was an accident.
However, some work had been done both by us and by many other people in
trying to make stars. The point is, we were successful when we
were trying to do something else. Had we not been aware of what a
star stone was, we might have passed over this thing and never
developed it into the business that it is today.
Incidently, we sold about $100,000.00 worth of stars
the first six months we made them. I think this proves that there
was a need for them.
MJ: Can you think
of any other facts that you think might interest the jeweler?
Burdick: It might be interesting to imagine how nature made
stars. We know that in natural stars there is titania
present. We know that in natural stars this titania is present as
an independant phase oriented in exactly the same manner as it is in
our synthetic stars. It would be easy to imagine that a natural
star was formed at very high temperature in the earth. And as the
earth cooled this crystal went through the temperature range say from
1100 to 1500 degrees Centigrade . . . the difference
being that we keep them in that temperature range for a few days.
But nature kept them in that temperature range for millions of
years. So the thing that causes the asterism in natural and
synthetic stars is identical, and you might say that at least some of
the processing is identical.
Linde patented their star sapphires in November of
1949. Production was discontinued in 1974 due to
overseas competition.